Liability – the quality; state, or condition of being legally obligated or accountable; a debt enforceable by civil remedy or criminal punishment

Notice: Types of liabilities are listed below.

liability:
n. (18c.)

1. Legal responsibility, either civil or criminal.  the condition of being bound in law and justice to pay an indebtedness or discharge some obligation.  Feil v Coeur D’Alene, 23 Idaho 32, 129 P 643.

The state or condition of a person after he has breached his contract or violated any obligation resting upon him.  Lattin v Gillette, 95 Cal 317 30 P 545.

A word of different meanings, the pertinent one to be gathered from the context in which it appears, construed in the light of surrounding  circumstances.  Evans v Kroh (Ky) 284 SW2d 329, 58 ALR2d 1446.

Sometimes synonymous with “debt.”  Anno: 58 ALR2d 1453.

Within the meaning of a statute of limitations: — under one view, a contract obligation; under another view, responsibility, embracing tort liability as well as contract liability.  34 Am J1st Lim Ac § 94.

As the word appears in a limitation on the creation of debt or liability of a state in excess of a prescribed amount: — a term having special reference to the warrant and legislative authority on which a state contract must rest, and on which alone a public debt must find a sanction in order to obligate the state.  49 Am J1st States § 66. [1]

1. Although broadly speaking “liability,” as used in the law, means legal responsibility, it is a general term whose precise meaning depends upon the context in which it appears. Among its usages are: a debt one is required to pay; an obligation one must discharge; the circumstance one is in when he has breached a contract; a person’s responsibility after she has committed a tort that causes injury It is also accurate to speak of the “criminal liability” of a person who has violated a criminal statute.

2. In everyday speech a burden or an unfavorable situation or circumstance. [2]

1. The quality; state, or condition of being legally obligated or accountable; legal responsibility to another or to society, enforceable by civil remedy or criminal punishment <liability for injuries caused by negligence>. — aka legal liability; subjection; responsibility.

2. A financial or pecuniary obligation in a specified amount; DEBT <tax liability> <assets & liabilities> [1]

     Excerpt from William R. Anson’s Principles of the Law of Contract:

  “The term ‘liability’ is one of the least double signification, in one sense is the synonym of duty, the correlative of right; in this sense it is the opposite e of privilege or liberty. If a duty rests upon a party, society is now commanding performance by him & threatening penalties. In a second sense, the term ‘liability’ is the correlative of power & the opposite of immunity.  In this case society is not yet commanding performance, but it will so command if the possessor of the power does some operative act. If one has a power, the other has a liability.  It would be wise to adopt the second sense exclusively.  Accurate legal thinking is difficult when the fundamental terms have shifting senses.[4]

     Excerpt from John Salmond’s Jurisprudence:

     “Liability or responsibility is the bond of necessity that exists between the wrongdoer & the remedy of the wrong.  This vinculum juris is not one of a mere duty or obligation; it pertains not to the sphere of ought but to that of must.[5]

1. A state’s liability or responsibility that arises even in the absence of any intention or negligence imputable to the state. — aka absolute responsibility. [3]

Various Types of Liabilities:

accomplice liability – (1958) Criminal responsibility of one who acts with another before, during, or (in some jurisdictions) after a crime.  See 18 USCA § 2

accrued liability – (1877) A debt or obligation that is properly chargeable in a given accounting period but that is not yet paid.

aiding-and-abetting liability – (1972) Civil or, more typically, criminal liability imposed on one who assists in or facilitates the commission of an act that results in harm or loss, or who otherwise promotes the act’s accomplishment. See AID AND ABET. Cf. causer liability.

alternative liability – (1929) Liability arising from the tortious acts of two or more parties -when the plaintiff proves that one of the defendants has caused harm but cannot prove which one caused it -resulting in a shifting of the burden of proof to each defendant. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433B(3) (1965).

causer liability – (1984) Civil or criminal liability imposed on the person whose acts resulted in harm or loss.  Cf. aiding~and~abetting liability.

civil liability – (1817) 1. Liability imposed under the civil, as opposed to the criminal, law. 2. The quality, state, or condition of being legally obligated for civil damages.

contingent liability – (18c) A liability that will occur only if a specific event happens; a liability that depends on the occurrence of a future and uncertain event.  *  In financial statements, contingent liabilities are usu. stated in footnotes.

coordinate liability – (2003) A common liability shared equally by two or more persons for one debt or sum, discharge of the debt by one giving rise to contribution rights. ‘

corporate liability – (1821) Liability incurred by a company as a result of certain acts of its members or officers.

current liability – (1889) A business liability that will be paid or otherwise discharged with current assets or by creating other current liabilities within the next year (or operating cycle). Also termed short-term debt.

derivative liability – (1886) Liability for a wrong that a person other than the one wronged has a right to redress.  *  Examples include liability to a widow in a wrongful-death action and liability to a corporation in a shareholder’s derivative suit.

enterprise liability – (1941) 1. A type of liability, inspired by workers’ compensation, holding that business enterprises should be responsible for the injuries caused by their activities, regardless of fault or blameworthiness.  See, e. g, Howard C. Klemme, “The Enterprise Theory of Torts,” 47 Colo. L. Rev. 153, 158 (1976) (“In its broadest terms the theory of enterprise liability in torts is that losses to society created or caused by an enterprise or, more precisely, by an activity, ought to be borne by that enterprise or activity.”).  2. The first collective theory of products liability, making each member of a small industry jointly liable when each is aware of the risks and has jointly controlled those risks. See Hall v. E.1. DuPont De Neumours & Co., 345 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.N.Y. 1972) Cf. market-share liability. 3. Liability imposed on each member of an industry responsible for manufacturing a harmful or defective product, allotted by each manufacturer’s market share of the industry. — aka (in senses 1-3) industry-wide liabilitySee market-share liability.  4. Criminal liability imposed o a business (such as a corporation or partnership) for certain offenses, such as public-welfare offenses or offenses for which the legislature specifically intended to impose criminal sanctions.  See Model Penal Code § 2.07See public-welfare offense under OFFENSE (2).

fault liability – (1930) Liability based on some degree n blameworthiness. -Also termed fault-based liability Cf. strict liability.

independent liability – (1823) Liability arising from an individual’s actions, unrelated to any other sources 01 liability.

industry-wide liability – See enterprise liability (2), (3).

innkeeper’s liability – (1828) The liability of a hotelier for loss of or damage to a guest’s property when the loss is not caused by the guest, an act of nature, or civil unrest.

b ‘oint and several liability. (1819) Liability that may e apportioned either among two or more parties or to only one or a few select members of the group, at the adversary’s discretion. 0 Thus, each liable party is individually responsible for the entire obligation, but a paying party may have a right of contribution or indem« nity from nonpaying parties. -Abbr. ISL. See solidary ‘ liability. > joint liability. (18c) Liability shared by two or more parties. ‘

liability in solido. See solidary liability. > liability without fault. See strict liability.

limited liability. (1833) Liability restricted by law or contract; esp., the liability of a company’s owners for nothing more than the capital they have invested in the business.

market-share liability. (1980) Liability that is imposed, usu. severally, on each member of an industry, based on each member’s share of the market or respective percentage of the product that is placed on the market.

oilicial liability. Liability of an officer or receiver for a breach of contract or a tort committed during the oflicer’s or receiver’s tenure, but not involving any personal liability.

penal liability. (1832) Liability arising from a proceeding intended at least partly to penalize a wrongdoer. Cf. remedial liability.

personal liability. (18c) Liability for which one is personally accountable and for which a wronged party can seek satisfaction out of the wrongdoer’s personal assets.

premises liability. See PREMISES LIABILITY.

primary liability – (1834) Liability for which one is directly responsible, as opposed to secondary liability.

products liability – See PRODUCTS LIABILITY.

remedial liability – (1919) Liability arising from a proceeding whose object contains no penal element. 0 The two types of proceedings giving rise to this liability are specific enforcement and restitution. Cf. penal liability.

secondary liability – (1830) Liability that does not arise unless the primarily liable party fails to honor its obliv gation.

several liability – (1819) Liability that is separate and distinct from another’s liability, so that the plaintiff may bring a separate action against one defendant without joining the other liable parties.

shareholder’s liability – (1886) l. The statutory, added, or double liability of a shareholder for a corporation’s debts, despite full payment for the stock. 2. The l lab ity of a shareholder for any unpaid stock listed as {u owned on the stock certificate, usu. occurring eith when the shareholder agrees to pay full par value {. the stock and obtains the certificate before the stock paid for, or when partially paid-for stock is intentinally issued by a corporation as fully paid, the consideration for it being entirely hctitious. — aka stockholders liability.

solidary liability – (1921) Civil law. The liability of any one debtor among two or more join debtors to pay the entire debt if the creditor so chooses La. Civ. Code art. 1794. 0 This is equivalent to joint ant several liability in the common law. -Also termed liar bility in solido. See joint and several liability.

statutory liability – (1821) Liability that is created by a statute (or regulation) as opposed to common law.

strict liability – (1844) Liability that does not depend on proof of negligence or intent to do harm but that is based instead on a duty to compensate the harms proximately caused by the activity or behavior subject to the liability rule.  *  Prominent examples of strict liability involve the rules governing abnormally dangerous activities and the commercial distribution of defective products. — aka liability without fault. See strict products liability under PRODUCTS LIABILITY. Cf. absolute liability; fault liability; OUTCOME RESPONSIBILITY.

tortious liability – (1894) Liability that arises from the breach of a duty that (1) is fixed by the law, (2) is categorical in nature and owed to any person who is within the scope of the duty, and (3) when breached, is redressable by an action for compensatory, unliquidated damages.  *  In some cases, tortious liability can also be redressed by extracompensatory or punitive damages.

vicarious liability – (1875) Liability that a supervisory party (such as an employer) bears for the actionable conduct of a subordinate or associate (such as an employee) based on the relationship between the two parties. -Also termed imputed liability. See RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR. l

     “The vicarious liability of an employer for torts commit. ted by employees should not be confused with the liabill ity an employer has for his own torts. An employer whose employee commits a tort may be liable in his own right for negligence in hiring or supervising the employee. If in my business 1 hire a truck driver who has a record of drunk driving and on whom one day I detect the smell of bourbon, I (along with my employee) may be held liable for neglilgence if his driving causes injury. But that is not ‘vicarious’ i; liability-l am held liable for my own negligence in hiring i that employee or letting him drive after i know he has been drinking.” Kenneth 5. Abraham, The Forms and Functions of Tort Law 166 (2002)..

Types of Liabilities:

liability created by statute – a liability created by statute, as opposed to one created by contract.

tortious liability – liability that arises from the breach of a duty that, when breached, is redressable by an action for compensatory, unliquidated damages.

absolute liability – a type of strict liability based on causation alone, without any other limiting factors. [1]

 

liability bond. See BOND (2). liability dividend. See scrip dividend under DIVIDEND.

liability in solido. See solidary liability under LIABILITY. liability insurance. See INSURANCE.

liability limit. (1915) Insurance. The maximum amount of coverage that an insurance company will provide on a

single claim under an insurance policy. -Also termed m1: of liability; policy limits.

‘ ‘ty release. See general release under RELEASE (8).

References:

[1]: Black’s Law Dictionary Deluxe Tenth Edition by Henry Campbell Black & Editor in Chief Bryan A. Garner. ISBN: 978-0-314-62130-6

[2]: Ballantine’s Law Dictionary with Pronunciations
Third Edition
 by James A. Ballantine (James Arthur 1871-1949).  Edited by William S. Anderson.  © 1969 by THE LAWYER’S CO-OPERATIVE PUBLISHING COMPANY.  Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 68-30931

[3]:  Ballantine’s Law Dictionary Legal Assistant Edition
by Jack Ballantine 
(James Arthur 1871-1949).  Doctored by Jack G. Handler, J.D. © 1994 Delmar by Thomson Learning.  ISBN 0-8273-4874-6.

[4]: William R. Anson, Principles of the Law of Contract 9 (Arthur L. Corbin ed., 3d Am. ed. 1919)

[5]: John Salmond’s Jurisprudence 364 (Glanville L. Williams ed., 10th ed. 1947)

******************************************

What Are Torts?

All Types of Writs, Orders, & Motions

Federal Rules of Procedure

Intro to Law

Like this website?

Please Support Our Fundraiser

or donate via PayPal:

Notice: Wild Willpower does not condone the actions of Maximilian Robespierre, however the above quote is excellent!

This website is being broadcast for First Amendment purposes courtesy of

Questions?  Suggestion(s) for improvement?  Want to offer financial support?  Email Distance@WildWillpower.org.  We look forward to hearing from you!