Action for Neglect to Prevent mentions “Section 1985“, which is Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights. In summary, this statute mandates that “every citizen who having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned within 42 § 1985 – Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights are about to be committed and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, shall be liable to the party injured or party’s legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such party by reasonable diligence could have prevented, and any number of citizens guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action.” Important information below!
Action for Neglect to Prevent:
Powerful Code Combo!!
Notice:
The author of this page has not successfully done this yet nor has she attempted it. The below “code combo” is a theory yet to be actualized.
“Stopping Injustice from Happening from within The Courtroom”:
To explain this combo, first let’s take a look at Rule 24 “Intervention of Right” from within the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
One example of a “federal statute” that could “give an unconditional right” for “anyone” to “intervene”– which the court “must permit”– would be
U.S. Code Title 42 §1986
Action for Neglect to Prevent
When corruption is being witnessed in court, for instance, (rights being denied to Defendant) one way that the above three codes can “work together” is by interjecting from the audience if need be & saying something such as, “I’m making a Motion for an Intervention of Right, Your Honour.” Due to the fact that Motions may be “written or oral”, another way is to file a written Motion via the Clerk of Court, thereby referencing Rule 24, Action for Neglect to Prevent, & Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights respectively.
How “Action for Neglect to Prevent” gives an “Unconditional Right” to Intervene:
“Your honor, I could have been charged with “Action for Neglect to Prevent” had I NOT performed an “Intervention of Right” BECAUSE I am clearly witnessing United States Code “Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights” taking place now.”
Clarification:
“Action for Neglect to Prevent” forced the “Intervention of Right“, making it unstoppable because “Intervention of Right” mandates “the court must permit”.
Troubleshooting:
If the Judge or Magistrate does not permit the Intervention of Right, they may then be charged with 2 counts of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law— one count for depriving your “Intervention of Right” & one count for depriving The Defendant of their Right to Due Process (5th Amendment)— which would also be grounds for a case to be dismissed. The Judge or Magistrate could also be charged with Contempt of Court for “not following proper procedure”. To file such charges, File an Affidavit Citizen’s Arrest via follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Thank you IzQuotes.com for this cutely-relevant Mark Twain quote!
Transcript of Codes:
United States Code Title 42
CHAPTER 21
SUBCHAPTER I §1986. Action for neglect to prevent
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefor, and may recover not exceeding $5,000 damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.[1] [2]
Transcript of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 24 – Intervention: www.federalrulesofcivilprocedure.org/frcp/title-iv-parties/rule-24-intervention/
9-39.000 – Contempt Of Court
Contempt of court is an act of disobedience or disrespect towards the judicial branch of the government, or an interference with its orderly process. It is an offense against a court of justice or a person to whom the judicial functions of the sovereignty have been delegated.[3]
More Need-to-Know U.S. Codes
References:
[1]: U.S. Government Publishing Office, “Title 42 – THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE – CHAPTER 21 – CIVIL RIGHTS – SUBCHAPTER I – GENERALLY – Sec. 1986 – Action for neglect to prevent”: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title42/html/USCODE-2010-title42-chap21-subchapI-sec1986.htm
[2]: U.S. House of Representatives’ Office of Law Revision Counsel, “Action for Neglect to Prevent”: http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=action+for+neglect+to+prevent+title+42&f=treesort&fq=true&num=29&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title42-section1986
[3] U.S. Department of Justice, Offices of the United States Attorneys, “9-39.000 – Contempt Of Court”: www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-39000-contempt-court