{"id":13671,"date":"2018-02-11T20:56:42","date_gmt":"2018-02-11T20:56:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/?page_id=13671"},"modified":"2018-02-19T05:09:38","modified_gmt":"2018-02-19T05:09:38","slug":"fact","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/?page_id=13671","title":{"rendered":"Fact &#8211; a deed; an act; that which exists and is real and true \u2014 which actually took place \u2014 not that which might not have occurred"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"font-size: 18pt;\"><span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\">fact<\/span>:<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n(15c)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>1. Something that actually exists; an aspect of reality<\/strong> &lt;it is a fact that all people are mortal&gt;<strong>.\u00a0 *\u00a0 Facts include not just tangible things, actual occurrences, and relationships, but also states of mind such as intentions and the holding of opinions. <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>2. An actual or alleged event or circumstance, as distinguished from its legal effect, consequence, or interpretation<\/strong> &lt;the jury made a finding of fact&gt;<strong>.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">historical fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>3. An evil deed; a crime<\/strong> &lt;an accessory after the fact&gt;<strong>. <\/strong>[1]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>1. A deed; an act; that which exists; that which is real; that which is true, an actuality; that which took place, not that which might or might not have took place, not that which might or might not have occurred. <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em>Churchill v Meade<\/em>, 92 or 626, 182 P 368<\/span>.<\/strong> [2]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>1. An actual occurrence, as distinguished from the legal consequences of the occurrence; something that took place, not something that might or might not have occurred; an act or deed; that which exists; that which is real; that which is true.<\/strong>\u00a0 [3]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Excerpt from Thomas Starkie&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/cu31924020112888\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Practical Treatise on the Law of Evidence<\/em><\/a> (2d Am. ed. 1828):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201c<span style=\"color: #800000;\">By facts and circumstances are meant all things and relations, whether natural or artificial, which really exist, whether their existence be perceptible by the senses, or otherwise.<\/span>\u201d<\/strong> [4]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Excerpt from John H. Wigmore&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/students-textbook-law-evidence-University\/dp\/B00085SIHO\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Students\u2019 Textbook of the Law of Evidence<\/em><\/a> (1935):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201c<span style=\"color: #800000;\">A fact is any act or condition of things, assumed (for the moment) as happening or existing.<\/span>\u201d<\/strong> [5]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"font-size: 18pt;\"><span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\">adjudicative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/span><\/strong> (1959)<strong> A controlling or operative fact, rather than a background fact; a fact that is particularly related to the parties to a proceeding and that helps the tribunal determine how the law applies to those parties.\u00a0 *\u00a0 For example, adjudicative facts include those that the jury weighs.<\/strong>\u00a0 See <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/?page_id=4507\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Fed. R. Evid. 201<\/strong><\/a>.\u00a0 Cf. legislative fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">alienative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1902) <strong>A fact that divests a person of a right by transferring it to another.<\/strong><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">ancient fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (17c) <strong>A fact about a person, thing, or event that existed or occurred a very long time ago, and about which no living person has firsthand knowledge. <\/strong>\u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">fact in pais<\/span><\/strong><\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">collateral fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (18c) <strong>A fact not directly connected to the issue in dispute, especially because it involves a different transaction from the one at issue.\u00a0 *\u00a0 Evidence of collateral facts is generally inadmissible.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">denotative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1982) <strong>A fact relevant to the use of a nonlegal term in a legal rule.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">dispositive fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1946) <strong>1. A fact that confers rights or causes the loss of rights.\u00a0 *\u00a0 A dispositive fact may be either an investitive or a divestitive fact.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">vestitive fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>.<strong>\u00a0 2. A fact that is decisive of a legal matter; evidence that definitively resolves a legal issue or controversy.<\/strong>\u00a0 See <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/?page_id=13759\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>DISPOSITION<\/strong><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">divestitive fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1973) <strong>A fact that causes the loss of rights; an act or event modifying or extinguishing a legal relation. <\/strong>\u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">extinctive <\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>; <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">destitutive fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>; <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>ablative fact<\/strong><\/em><\/span>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">evaluative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1986) <strong>A fact used to assess an action as being reasonable or negligent.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">evidentiary fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1855) <strong>1. A fact that is necessary to the operation of an evidentiary rule or <\/strong><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>that is necessary for or leads to the determination of an ultimate fact.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">predicate fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>.\u00a0 <strong>2. A fact that furnishes evidence of the existence of some other fact.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">evidential fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>.\u00a0 3. See <em>fact in evidence<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">exonerative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1980) <strong>A divestitive fact that extinguishes a duty.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">fabricated fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> <strong>False or deceitful evidence that is unlawfully created, usually after the relevant event, in an attempt to achieve or avoid liability or conviction. <\/strong>\u2014 aka<em><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong> fabricated evidence<\/strong><\/span><\/em>.<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">simulated fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1943) <strong>A fabricated fact intended to mislead; a lie.<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">fact in evidence<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (18c)<strong> A fact that a tribunal considers in reaching a conclusion; a fact that has been admitted into evidence in a trial or hearing.<\/strong> \u2014 Also written <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>fact-<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>in-evidence<\/strong><\/em><\/span>. \u2014 aka <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>evidentiary fact<\/strong><\/em><\/span>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0<strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Excerpt from John H. Wigmore&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/students-textbook-law-evidence-University\/dp\/B00085SIHO\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A Students\u2019 Textbook of the Law of Evidence<\/a> (1935):<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201c<span style=\"color: #800000;\">A fact-in-evidence, or, briefly, evidence, signifies any facts considered by the tribunal as data to persuade them to reach a reasoned belief upon a probandum.\u00a0 This process of thought by which the tribunal reasons from fact to proban<\/span><\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">dum is termed inference.<\/span>\u201d<\/strong> [6]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">fact in issue<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (usu. pl.) (17c) <strong>1.<\/strong> <em>Hist<\/em>. <strong>A fact that one party alleges and that the other controverts.\u00a0 2. A fact to be determined by a fact-finder; PROBANDUM.\u00a0<\/strong> See <em>factum probandum<\/em> under FACTUM. \u2014 Also written <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">fact-in-issue<\/span><\/strong><\/em>. \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">principal fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Excerpt from John H. Wigmore&#8217;s<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/students-textbook-law-evidence-University\/dp\/B00085SIHO\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> <em>A Students\u2019 Textbook of the Law of Evidence<\/em><\/a> (1935):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201c<span style=\"color: #800000;\">A fact-in-issue is a fact as to the correctness of which the tribunal, under the law of the case, must be persuaded; the term \u2018probandum\u2019 (thing to be proved) will here be used as <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">the convenient single word.<\/span>\u201d <\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">[6]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">fact material to risk<\/span> -(<\/strong>1882) <em>Insurance<\/em>. <strong>A fact that may increase the risk and that, if disclosed, might induce <\/strong><\/span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">the insurer either to decline to insure or to require a higher premium.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">immaterial fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1810) <strong>A fact that is not relevant to a matter in issue.<\/strong>\u00a0 Cf. material fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">impositive fact<\/span> &#8211; An investitive fact that imposes duties.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">inferential fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1858) <strong>A fact established by conclusions drawn from other evidence rather than from direct testimony or evidence; a fact derived logically from other facts.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">intermediate fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1852) <strong>A fact that helps lead to an ultimate fact or is a necessary element to a chain of reasoning leading to a conclusion. <\/strong>\u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">basic <\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>. See MIXED QUESTION OF LAW AND FACT.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">mixed question of law and fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1805) <strong>An issue that is neither a pure question of fact nor a pure question of law.\u00a0 *\u00a0 Mixed questions of law and fact are typically resolved by juries.\u00a0<\/strong>\u2014 Often shortened to <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">mixed question<\/span><\/strong><\/em>.\u00a0\u2014 aka <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>mixed question of fact and law<\/strong><\/em><\/span>; <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>mixed issue of law and fact<\/strong><\/em><\/span>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Excerpt from 9A Charles Alan Wright &amp; Arthur R. Miller,<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com\/law-products\/Legal-Encyclopedias\/Federal-Practice-and-Procedure-Wright--Miller\/p\/100028918\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Federal Practice and Procedure<\/em><\/a> <span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00a7 2589, at 608-11 (2d ed. 1995):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 &#8220;<span style=\"color: #800000;\">Many issues in a lawsuit involve elements of both law and fact.\u00a0 Whether these be referred to as mixed questions of law and fact, or legal inferences from the facts, or the application of law to the facts, there is substantial authority that they are not protected by the &#8216;clearly erroneous&#8217; rule and are freely reviewable.\u00a0 This principle has been applied to antitrust violations, bankruptcy, contracts, copyright, taxation, and to other areas of the law.<\/span>&#8220;<\/strong> [7]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">investitive fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1939) <strong>A fact that confers rights.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>collative fact<\/strong><\/em><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">judicially noticed fact <\/span>&#8211;<\/strong> (1930) <strong>A fact that is not established by admissible evidence but may be accepted by the court because the fact is generally known within the trial court\u2019s territorial jurisdiction, or because its validity can be determined from sources whose accuracy cannot be reasonably questioned.<\/strong>\u00a0 See <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/?page_id=4507\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Fed. R. Evid. 201(b)<\/strong><\/a>. \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">judicial fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>. See JUDICIAL NOTICE.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">jurisdictional fact <\/span>&#8211;<\/strong> (usu. pl.) (1837) A fact that must exist for a court to properly exercise its jurisdiction <\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">over a case, party, or thing.\u00a0 See JURISDICTIONAL-FACT DOCTRINE.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">jurisdictional-fact doctrine<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1932) <em>Administrative law<\/em>. <strong>The principle that if evidence is presented challenging the factual findings that triggered an agency&#8217;s action, then a court will review the facts to determine whether the agency had authority to act in the first place.\u00a0 *\u00a0 This doctrine is generally no longer applied.<\/strong>\u00a0 Cf. CONSTITUTIONAL-FACT DOCTRINE.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">constitutional-fact doctrine<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong>\u00a0 (1937)<strong> 1. The rule that federal courts are not bound by an administrative agency&#8217;s findings of fact when the facts involved whether the agency has exceeded constitutional limitations on its power, especially regarding personal rights.\u00a0 *\u00a0 The courts reviewed the facts de novo to afford protection of constitutional rights.\u00a0 Although it has not been overruled or wholly discredited, this rule has fallen out of favor.\u00a0 2. The rule that a federal appellate court is not bound by a trial court&#8217;s findings of fact when constitutional rights are implicated, specifically in citizenship-determination and First Amendment cases.<\/strong>\u00a0 See,<em> e.g. <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Base Corp. v. Consumers Union<\/strong><\/span><\/em><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>, 466 U.S. 485, 104 S.Ct. 1949 (1984)<\/strong><\/span>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">legal fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (18c) <strong>1. A fact that triggers a particular legal consequence, Whether or not the actor intended that effect.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>juridical fact<\/strong><\/em><\/span>.\u00a0 <strong>2. A fact concerning the state of the law.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">legislative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1828) <strong>A fact that explains a particular law\u2019s rationality and that helps a court or agency determine the law\u2019s meaning and application.\u00a0 *\u00a0 Legislative facts are not ordinarily specific to the parties in a proceeding.\u00a0<\/strong> Cf. adjudicative fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Excerpt from Paul F. Rothstein&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/rothstein-paul-f.cfm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Federal Rules of Evidence<\/em><\/a> (3d ed. 2003):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201c<span style=\"color: #800000;\">[L]egislative fact includes matters needed to construe statutes or regulations, and factual assumptions a court makes when called upon\u2018 to \u2018legislate.\u2019\u00a0 Examples of the latter might include the fact that spouses will communicate less if they are not granted a privilege covering their confidences, or that marital harmony will be strained if spouses can be compelled to testify against each other facts which might be useful in helping a court decide whether to<\/span><\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\"> create or continue a common-law marital privilege . . . . Obviously, legislative facts of this nature do not and cannot meet the indisputability criterion of the<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/?page_id=4507\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Rule [Fed. R. Evid. 201]<\/a><span style=\"color: #800000;\">, nor are they required to.<\/span>\u201d<\/strong> [8]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">material fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1848) <strong>A fact that is significant or essential to the issue or matter at hand; especially, a fact that makes a difference in the result to be reached in a given case.\u00a0 *\u00a0 What constitutes a material fact is a matter of <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/?page_id=8731\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">substan<\/a><\/strong><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>tive law.<\/strong>\u00a0 Cf. immaterial fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">minor fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1813) <strong>A subordinate fact or circumstance.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">subsidiary fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">negative fact<\/span> &#8211; The absence or nonexistence of a quality, state, or condition.<\/strong>\u00a0 Cf. positive fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0<strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Excerpt from Charles Frederic Chamberlayne&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/cu31924020154310\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Modern Law of Evidence<\/em><\/a> (1911):<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201c<span style=\"color: #800000;\">The important consideration in connection with negative facts is the greatly increased difficult of establishing by evidence the truth of a negative proposition, i.e., of proving the nonexistence of a fact.\u00a0 A positive fact \u2014 an existence is capable of being verified. If physical, it may be verified, its existence ascertained, by perception, the employment of the sense faculties of the observer.\u00a0 If the fact be a psychological one, it may be recognized by a direct act of consciousness.\u00a0 As Bentham puts it, \u2018in most cases, we cannot perceive nonexistence or absence.\u00a0 We can only infer it from something existing and present which we do perceive.\u2019\u00a0 This is, of course, not universally true.\u00a0 Certain negative facts, mere absences or nonexistences of their positive correlative terms seem capable of direct perception.\u00a0 Thus, cold is merely the nonexistence of heat, yet we may be fairly said to perceive it.\u00a0 In a certain sense, we may be said to perceive darkness, though simply the nonexistence or withdrawal of light.\u00a0 It is not an improper use of language to say that we are conscious of the absence or nonexistence of sound, i.e., of silence.\u00a0 In all such cases \u2014 as of the cessation of a customary or pleasurable state \u2014 we may be said to be conscious of a lack, to an extent which, coming to the consciousness through the sense, differs but slightly, if at all, from perception.<\/span>\u201d<\/strong> [9]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">operative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1857) <strong>1. A fact that affects an existing legal relation, especially a legal claim.\u00a0 *\u00a0 In the context of the hearsay rule, this term distinguishes out-of-court statements that are operative facts, and thus not hearsay (e.g., a party\u2019s saying \u201cI agree to reimburse you\u201d in a case for breach of oral contract), from out-of-court statements that relate only to operative facts (e.g., \u201cJoel told me Mike said he would reimburse me\u201d), and thus are hearsay.\u00a0 2. A fact that constitutes the transaction or event on which a claim or defense is based.\u00a0 *\u00a0 Some jurisdictions hold that claim preclusion bars litigation of <\/strong><\/span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">a claim based on the same \u201ccore of operative facts\u201d as a <\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>previously litigated action.<\/strong>\u00a0 See <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong><em>Frier v. City of Vandalia<\/em>, 770 F.2d 699 (7th Cir. 1985) (applying Illinois law)<\/strong><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">physical fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1857) A fact having a physical existence, such as a fingerprint left at a crime scene.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">positive fact<\/span> &#8211; The presence or existence of a quality, state, or condition.\u00a0<\/strong> Cf. negative fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">predicate fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1899) <strong>1. A fact from which a presumption or inference arises.\u00a0 2. A fact necessary to the Operation of an evidentiary rule.\u00a0 *\u00a0 For example, there must be a conspiracy for the coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule to apply.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">foundational fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>; <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">evidentiary fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">presumed fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1822) <strong>A fact whose existence can be justifiably inferred from facts established by evidence.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">primary fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (18c) <strong>A fact that can be established by direct testimony and from which inferences are made leading to ultimate facts, especially those based on the tort theory of public disclosure of private facts.<\/strong>\u00a0 See ultimate <\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">fact. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">private fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (16c) <strong>A fact that has not been made public; especially, a fact that relates to the intimate or private aspects of a person\u2019s life.\u00a0 *\u00a0 Whether a fact is private often arises in invasion-of-privacy claims.\u00a0<\/strong> Cf. public fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">probative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1858) <strong>A fact in evidence used to prove an ultimate fact, such as skid marks used to show speed as a predicate to a finding of negligence. <\/strong>\u2014 <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><em><strong>factum probans<\/strong><\/em><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">psychological fact <\/span>&#8211;<\/strong> (1863) <strong>A fact that is related to mental state, such as motive or knowledge.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">public fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1955)<strong> For the purpose of an invasion-of-privacy claim, a fact that is in a public record or in the public domain.<\/strong>\u00a0 Cf. private fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">relative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1862) <strong>A fact incidental to another fact; a minor fact.\u00a0<\/strong> See <em>minor fact<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">translative fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1880) <strong>A fact by means of which a right is transferred from one person to another; a fact that fulfills the double function of terminating one person\u2019s right to an object and of originating another\u2019s right to it.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">transvestitive fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (1883) <strong>A fact that is simultaneously investitive and divestitive.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Excerpt from W.A. Hunter&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/asystematicandh00crosgoog\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Systematic and Historical Exposition of Roman Law<\/em><\/a> (4th ed. 1903):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201c<span style=\"color: #800000;\">When a person transfers the rights he has to another, the transfer divests him of the <em>potestas<\/em>, and invests that other with it. This is quite distinct from the creation or extinction of the <em>potestas<\/em>. A new descriptive term is wanted, and after the analogy of the other words, \u2018transvestitive\u2019 has been coined for the purpose.<\/span>\u201d<\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">[10]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">ultimate fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (18c) <strong>1. A fact essential to the claim or the defense.<\/strong> \u2014 aka <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">elemental fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>; <em><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">principal fact<\/span><\/strong><\/em>.\u00a0 <strong>2. A fact that is found by making an inference or deduction from findings of other facts; specifically, a factual conclusion derived from intermediate facts.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff; font-size: 18pt;\">undisputed fact<\/span> &#8211;<\/strong> (18c) <strong>An uncontested or admitted fact. <\/strong><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">[1] <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 14pt;\">For the critically important distinction between question of fact and a question of law, see and compare <em>question of fact<\/em>; <em>question of law<\/em>.\u00a0 See also <em>accessory after the fact<\/em>; <em>accessory before the fact<\/em>; <em>evidentiary facts<\/em>; <em>matter of fact<\/em>; <em>probative facts<\/em>; <em>ultimate facts<\/em>. [3]<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-large;\">References:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-size: large;\">Disclaimer:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"> All material throughout this website is compiled in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/\/?page_id=2191\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Fair Use<\/a>.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>[1]: <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/\/?page_id=5154#sdfootnote1anc\" name=\"sdfootnote1sym\">Black\u2019s Law Dictionary\u00a0Deluxe Tenth Edition\u00a0by Henry Campbell Black &amp; Editor in Chief Bryan A. Garner<\/a>. ISBN: 978-0-314-62130-6<\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>[2]: <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/\/?page_id=9167\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ballantine\u2019s Law Dictionary\u00a0<\/a><\/b><\/span><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/\/?page_id=9167\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>with Pronunciations<br \/>\n<\/b><\/span><\/em><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>Third Edition<\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/a><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>by James A. Ballantine\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/strong><em><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>(James Arthur 1871-1949).\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/em><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>Edited by William S. Anderson.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a9 1969 by THE LAWYER\u2019S CO-OPERATIVE PUBLISHING COMPANY.\u00a0 Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 68-30931<\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>[3]:\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/\/?page_id=7679\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ballantine\u2019s Law Dictionary <\/a><\/b><\/span><\/strong><em><a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/\/?page_id=7679\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>Legal Assistant Edition<\/b><\/span><\/a><\/em><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b><br \/>\nby Jack Ballantine\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/strong><em><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>(James Arthur 1871-1949).\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawyeredu.org\/what-is-a-juris-doctorate-degree.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>Doctored<\/b><\/span><\/a><\/strong><em><span style=\"font-size: large;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/em><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\"><b>by\u00a0Jack G. Handler,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawyeredu.org\/what-is-a-juris-doctorate-degree.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">J.D.<\/a>\u00a0\u00a9 1994 Delmar by Thomson Learning.\u00a0 ISBN 0-8273-4874-6.<\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">[4]: 1 Thomas Starkie, <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/cu31924020112888\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Practical Treatise on the Law of Evidence<\/em><\/a> 15 (2d Am. ed. 1828).<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">[5]: John H. Wigmore, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/students-textbook-law-evidence-University\/dp\/B00085SIHO\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Students\u2019 Textbook of the Law of Evidence<\/em><\/a> 7 (1935).<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">[6]: John H. Wigmore, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/students-textbook-law-evidence-University\/dp\/B00085SIHO\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A Students\u2019 Textbook of the Law of Evidence<\/a> 7 (1935).<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">[7]: 9A Charles Alan Wright &amp; Arthur R. Miller, <a href=\"https:\/\/legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com\/law-products\/Legal-Encyclopedias\/Federal-Practice-and-Procedure-Wright--Miller\/p\/100028918\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Federal Practice and Procedure<\/em><\/a> \u00a7 2589, at 608-11 (2d ed. 1995).<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">[8]: Paul F. Rothstein, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/rothstein-paul-f.cfm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Federal Rules of Evidence<\/em><\/a> 35-36 (3d ed. 2003).<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">[9]: 1 Charles Frederic Chamberlayne, <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/cu31924020154310\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Modern Law of Evidence<\/em><\/a> 86 (1911).<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">[10]: W.A. Hunter, <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/asystematicandh00crosgoog\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Systematic and Historical Exposition of Roman Law<\/em><\/a> 141 (4th ed. 1903).<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">*******************************<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-size: x-large;\">Home Page<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-large;\">Like this website?<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/wildwillpower.org\/contact-us\/wild-willpower-pac-needs-food-outdoor-gear-a-prius-v\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-size: x-large;\">Please Support Our Fundraiser<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-large;\">or donate via\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.paypal.com\/\">PayPal<\/a>:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<h4 class=\"western\" align=\"CENTER\"><span style=\"font-size: x-large;\"><ul class=\"ul-addw2p ul-addw2p-paypalbutton\">\n<li>please set some widgets to show from Appearance -> Widgets.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/span><\/h4>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.reunitethestates.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ReUniteTheStates-Card.jpg?resize=474%2C271\" width=\"474\" height=\"271\" name=\"graphics1\" align=\"BOTTOM\" border=\"0\" \/><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-size: large;\">Disclaimer:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\">\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wildwillpower.org\/\">Wild Willpower<\/a>\u00a0does not condone the actions of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=OglrzNohp3Q\">Maximilian Robespierre<\/a>, however the above quote is excellent!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><strong><span style=\"font-size: large;\">This website is being broadcast for\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wildwillpower.org\/about-wild-willpower\/a-peaceable-assembly-of-civilians\">First Amendment purposes<\/a>\u00a0courtesy of<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.wildwillpower.org\/about-wild-willpower\/a-peaceable-assembly-of-civilians\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/www.reunitethestates.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Wild-WIllpower-array-of-greens.jpg?resize=474%2C83\" width=\"474\" height=\"83\" name=\"graphics2\" align=\"BOTTOM\" border=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"CENTER\"><span style=\"font-size: x-large;\">Question(s)?\u00a0 Suggestion(s)?<br \/>\nDistance@WildWillpower.org.<br \/>\n<\/span><em><span style=\"font-size: x-large;\">We look forward to hearing from you!<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; fact: (15c) 1. Something that actually exists; an aspect of reality &lt;it is a fact that all people are mortal&gt;.\u00a0 *\u00a0 Facts include not just tangible things, actual occurrences, and relationships, but also states of mind such as intentions and the holding of opinions. 2. An actual or alleged event or circumstance, as distinguished &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/?page_id=13671\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Fact &#8211; a deed; an act; that which exists and is real and true \u2014 which actually took place \u2014 not that which might not have occurred<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":13632,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-13671","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13671"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13671\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14314,"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13671\/revisions\/14314"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13632"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reunitethestates.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}